Ruby vs Elixir

Side-by-side comparison of Ruby and Elixir — syntax, concurrency, and trade-offs.

Both Ruby and Elixir prioritize developer happiness, but they take fundamentally different approaches to concurrency. Ruby is object-oriented and interpreted; Elixir is functional and runs on the Erlang VM.

Feature Ruby Elixir
Paradigm Object-oriented Functional
Typing Dynamic, interpreted Dynamic, compiled to BEAM
Variable x = 42 (mutable) x = 42 (immutable rebinding)
Function def add(a, b) = a + b def add(a, b), do: a + b
Array nums = [1, 2, 3] nums = [1, 2, 3] (linked list)
Map m = { "a" => 1 } m = %{a: 1}
Struct User = Struct.new(:name) %User{name: "Ada"}
Error handling begin/rescue try/rescue + pattern matching
Pattern match Limited (case with ===) Pervasive ({a, b} = {1, 2})
Loop 5.times { |i| } Recursion / Enum.each
String interp "Hello #{name}" "Hello #{name}"
Concurrency Threads (GIL-limited) Actor model (millions of processes)
Module require / gems use / mix deps
Testing rspec ExUnit (built-in)
Hot reload No Yes (BEAM)
Fault tolerance Application-level Supervisor trees built-in

Concurrency Comparison

Ruby — Thread + Queue

queue = Queue.new
Thread.new { queue.push(42) }
val = queue.pop

Elixir — Actor Model / Task

task = Task.async(fn -> 42 end)
val = Task.await(task)

Elixir processes are isolated, lightweight (~300 bytes), and killed independently. Supervisors automatically restart failed processes. Ruby threads share memory and are constrained by the GIL for CPU-bound work.

When to Choose Ruby

When to Choose Elixir